Today I received a letter from HBC (Havant Borough Council) pertaining to the proposed development of the Dunsbury Hill Farm site, adjacent to the A3(M).
The description of the development is as follows:
Site Address: Dunsbury Hill Farm, Park Lane, Cowplain, Waterlooville
Proposed Development: Hybrid planning application comprising a part outline application relating to employment uses and a hotel with conference facilities and a part detailed application for a new link road with bus gate to Woolston Road; together with landscaping, infrastructure and associated works.
I am sure that they don’t intend to hide what this development really means but on first reading I was quite happy to go along with it. After all a new hotel and conference centre would not increase the daily traffic levels and road traffic noise. The additional employment opportunities that this would bring is also to welcomed.
However, without reading the actual proposal one is not likely to see what this really is. In their own words …
… proposed development of agricultural land at Dunsbury Hill Farm, Havant into a business and technology park with hotel, conference facilities and associated infrastructure
The development proposal includes the creation of a new roundabout and potential dualling of a section of the Hulbert Road. In addition there are plans to create a new parking area double the area of the current lay-bys this development will replace. All of this is an indication of the increased traffic that the developers are anticipating.
I have lived in this area since 1985. The survey that I had on my house at the time carries a final comment
shame about the noise from the motorway
Over the years I have become aware of the increasing noise levels and the changing nature of the noise. Waterlooville, specifically Junction 3 (J3), the junction of the B2150 with the A3(M), has become something of a hub for the emergency services. As a result anyone living near to this junction will have noticed the increased siren activity. If recent news articles are to be believed the newly opened Hindhead Tunnel is also contributing to increased noise levels along the A3(M) due to heavy goods traffic choosing the A3(M) in preference to the M3 now that the Hindhead traffic jams have been eliminated.
The application pack includes tables indicating noise levels. The constant theme running through the comments section is
A3 constant and dominant.
What is wrong with these tables is that they are taking noise level reading from a point on the centre line of the A3(M) into the development area and on into Calshot Road & Park Lane areas of Leigh Park. No measurements seem to have been taken from the Waterlooville side of the A3(M).
Yet this is the area that will probably be most affected by the additional traffic generated by the new development.
The location of this new development makes total sense when you consider the easy access to the motorway. Allowing traffic to clear the area very quickly. However, the very fact that all that traffic will be coming and going via J3 of the A3(M) is going to have a negative effect on the area.
Presumably the planners are thinking that this new development will provide jobs for the soon to be residents of the Berewood (ex Newlands) development on the opposite side of Waterlooville. Did they also consider the additional traffic that will inexorably be sucked across the town ? Such traffic will also be using the J3 roundabout.
I also have other questions, ones that I have asked in other of my posts …
- Are there any potential tenants who have committed to take up residence of these new units when they are built ?
- Has a major hotel chain registered any interest in running this proposed hotel and conference centre ?
- Was the land adjacent to Junction 2, Horndean, considered as the site for this development ? If it was, why was it rejected since there is less potential for affecting local residents and the motorway access is just as good ?I am assuming that the answer is that the land comes under East Hampshire District Council rather than Portsmouth City Council.
I am the first to bemoan the fact that the planners don’t seem to have done much to provide employment for the residents of Waterlooville. So I am loath to be totally negative about this proposed development. However, I don’t believe that the planners have got the true measure of the impact that this development will have.
As usual the only people who will truly gain from this are the developers and, for a short while, the folks employed to carry out the construction.