This is hardly breaking news.
Rashford is just a bloody footballer.
He is doing good things but I fail to see why it’s breaking news that the Prime Minister hasn’t spoken to him
This is hardly breaking news.
Rashford is just a bloody footballer.
He is doing good things but I fail to see why it’s breaking news that the Prime Minister hasn’t spoken to him
Love this sort of thing …….

• Venison for dinner again? Oh deer! • How does Moses make tea? Hebrews it. • England has no kidney bank, but it does have a Liverpool . • I tried to catch some fog, but I mist • They told me I had type-A blood, but it was a Typo. • I changed my […]
word play
This might be funny if it wasn’t so near the truth.

People are blaming the UK Government for not controlling the spread of Covid. This video indicates otherwise, shows who are responsible.
I find this whole spectacle sickening. What the hell are they thinking. Well quite obviously, they are not thinking. Alcohol fuelled stupidity.
And then they all go home to mix with friends and family
If you couldn’t see a reason for closing pubs, these idiots just provided all the ammunition the authorities needed.
What a bunch of selfish twats.
A little something to make my American friends smile and perhaps take a little stress out of the upcoming election process.
Great Britain (GB) or England as we English refer to it, is Repossessing the U.S.A. (US)
A Message from John Cleese (Monty Python)
To The citizens of the United States of America:
In light of your failure to nominate competent candidates for President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective immediately.
Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths, and territories (except Arkansas, which she does not fancy).
Your new prime minister, Boris Johnson, will appoint a governor for America without the need for further elections.
Congress and the Senate will be disbanded.
A questionnaire may be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed.
To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect:
You should look up “revocation” in the Oxford English Dictionary.
Only an idiot would contemplate putting this country through the chaos and confusion of Brexit again.
The Liberal Democrats will back Britain rejoining the European Union at an “appropriate future date” subject to public approval, the party has resolved.
A motion passed at the Lib Dems’ annual conference, with leadership backing, said the party should support a “longer-term objective” of EU membership in the future.
The EU is already trying to punish us for having the temerity to leave.
Can you imagine the gleeful wringing of hands that would precede any moves to rejoin ?
And, don’t forget the cost. Brexit has already cost billions. What will happen to any and all post Brexit trade agreements ? Especially with any countries that the EU doesn’t have a deal.
That is exactly the right attitude and well done the government for pointing out the museums responsibilities regarding Britain’s, history and heritage.
“As publicly funded bodies, you should not be taking actions motivated by activism or politics.
Oliver Dowden
So said Cultural Secretary Oliver Dowden in a letter to Britain’s museums following the BLM protests and subsequent vandalism and destruction of statues.
Erasing our history does not make things right, nor better. The museums job is to help people to understand.
The government also stated that “rather than erasing these objects, we should seek to contextualise or reinterpret them in a way that enables the public to learn about them in their entirety, however challenging this may be”.
We cannot apologise for the actions of our ancesters, nor should we.
It seems to me that Theodore Roosevelt had it about right.

We need something like this for the UK today.
Women with darker skin are more than twice as likely to be told their photos fail UK passport rules when they submit them online than lighter-skinned men, according to a BBC investigation.
So claims this BBC news article.
BBC News – UK passport photo checker shows bias against dark-skinned women https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-54349538
One black student said she was wrongly told her mouth looked open each time she uploaded five different photos to the government website.
Here is my own, personal, experience of the governments racist software.
I took a series of photos of my wife and selected the best of them to submit to the passport system. The selected photo was rejected on the basis that it didn’t meet the criteria. The issue was that the system couldn’t identify a clear demarcation of my wife’s hairline and her face, my wife is white skinned with blonde hair.
This experience has just highlighted the difference between automated systems and the human eye. In some circumstances the human eye is far superior.
The process, however, does allow you to challenge the automated rejection and to provide your argument as to why it is wrong. According to the article Ms Owusu did challenge the rejection and had her photo accepted.
I also challenged the rejection and the passport application was duly processed and my wife received her new passport.
This shows how “systemic racism” can spread, Elaine Owusu said.
This article has turned a frustrating technological problem into a problem of racism.
Is Ms Owusu suggesting that the software developers have programmed the system to give people of colour a hard time. To what end ?
Elaine Owusu, I think you are just jumping on the racism bandwagon and I, for one, am sick of the racism card being played at every turn.
The issue of racism is being rammed down our throats every minute of the day. Programming on the TV channels with a colour bias along with the adverts during and between programs. Open any newspaper and there it is.
All that this article proves is that the software is not perfect. It is not racist, just flawed. As technology advances the errors will reduce.
Congratulations Dan O’ Mahoney on your appointment as “Clandestine Channel Threat Commander”. Thanks for introducing yourself. You have a tough task ahead of you. Let us hope that Home Secretary, Priti Patel, gives you the support and backing needed for you to complete the task ahead.
So “Looby”, where exactly, in mainland Europe, are the bombs these people are fleeing ?

Whilst it may not be illegal to cross the English Channel, why would anyone cross hundreds of miles of safe French countryside, only to pay huge sums of money to risk their life, and the lives of their children, by crossing the English Channel in woefully overloaded craft?
If these people had a legitimate right to enter the UK, they would use the scheduled ferries and Eurostar rail systems, to safely cross the Channel, and at a fraction of the cost. The fact that they don’t take the open, legal, safe routes implies that they are anything but legitimate.
If, as you say, anyone can apply for asylum, why haven’t these people ?
Why are they sneaking in, trying to avoid all the legitimate checks and balances ?
What are they hiding ?
This continuing lemming-like flow across the Channel makes no sense.