Out it comes again, the “Human Rights” card.
So paedophiles can brush aside the human rights of their victims but once they, the paedophiles, have been convicted they can scream out for their own human rights.
It is sickening that our judicial system is falling over itself to ensure that they get their rights. In this case granting paedophiles a “right to a family life”, “allowing un-supervised visits with their children”, “allowing access to the internet”.
It is my belief that convicted paedophiles, as with any other criminal, jettison any rights when they opt to live outside the law.
Why does our judicial system, time and time again, care more about the criminal than it does about the victims.
WrAnTz 
This is disgusting. Someone who has taken away all the rights of someone else (whether it be a murderer, pedophile, etc.) deserves NO RIGHTS of their own. I remember when a vaccine was discovered that could completely destroy the libido of a sexual predator – I don’t really know how to describe it, but the perpetrator would never have any sexual thoughts/feelings about anyone or anything ever again. This seems like a logical treatment for such offenders, and it could even help them assimilate back into society so that we don’t have to pay for them to stay in jail. However, our Supreme Court ruled that it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL to give criminals such treatments. Is that a fucking joke? Isn’t it ‘unconstitutional’ to sexually assault people?!